Image Map

The systemic dismantling of what it means to believe

 

Have you ever wondered why everything in the world is so damn ironic these days? Psy, Bieber, geo politics, consumerism. Everything today either comes with a self-referential set of ironic functions or starts off with the qualifying statements like “I am not an expert” or “I don’t really know first hand but.” It’s as if if it is not equipped with an ironic escape hatch or an intellectual qualifier no one is comfortable in creating, sharing or believing in anything. Belieber jokes aside there’s an interesting phenomenon happening in our society today that could quite possibly be one of the most devastating attacks on humanity we’ve ever seen. That phenomenon is the pathological attack on the psychology of what it means to believe. What we see, read, hear and experience have all been systematically striped of all faith-based belief, leaving us with emotional gap in what that belief is supposed to uphold. In fact, this non-belief we’re seeing emerge out of this shared cultural attack is so extreme that one could quite easily diagnose it with a clinical diagnosis of what it means to be experiencing psychosis. The internet, of all places, is where this issue starts and ends.

The internet, through its massive surplus of information and dogmatic pursuit of transparency, has unleashed our collective rationality on almost every domain of information there is. Whether its the fictions of advertising, the hypocrisy of charitable giving, the falsities of organized religion or the failings of science and economics there is hardly a place left that hasn’t been trashed by the overly-rational pursuit of truth. Like rationality locusts we swarm in, shred beliefs from every angle and fly away to the next unsuspecting domain. We are, as it turns out, in the midst of an exposé of dialectic paralysis where no fact is left unchallenged and no belief unbeaten. But the paradoxical truth, which is ironically ironic, is that we demand more meaning from our choices than we ever have before. From the food we eat to the clothes we wear each choice has a depth of belief requirements that force you to be able to defend each choice as if it were your last. It’s as if we embody the truth of our choices in everything we do. It is our burden of having everything from all perspectives at once instantly.

Navigating this shit storm of rationality is challenging. It seems that we, believers, are left with three choices once the locusts have come and gone. One, pick up the pieces of our beliefs and try and make choices that are stripped of any existential value (I.E. purely rational choices based on utility). Two, become even more dogmatic about our beliefs and find shelter in an extremist view that rebels against the attack on those said beliefs (I.E. The radicalization of belief). Or three, accept the falsity of a belief and incorporate it as an irrational factor and just do whatever you want as if you believed it (I.E. I know very well but … ). Each of these three options just doesn’t seem ideal given the natural externalities we can imagine from each. Can you imagine a world filled with rational choices of sex, entertainment and creative exploration? Radicalization needs no more advocates. And accepting false beliefs as if they were true is precisely the unholy compromise that has casualties like global warming, indentured work and massive unemployment. The voraciousness of dismantling what it means to believe has real consequences and there are few that would see those outcomes today as anything really positive.

There are surely rationalists out there that see the honest representation of the material world has its virtues. I’m also sure that there are those that see belief existing beyond the subjective-objective domain, not accessible by the human spirit, as a faith worth believing in. But to both of those extremes I would point to the gap that remains in the day-to-day? Without belief in our everyday we would cease to progress, explore, take leaps and care for a world that needs a future. We need heroes, fictions, stories and faith to sooth our minds to the harsh rationalities of our world. I just wish that the internets would change their locust-like behaviour into one that builds beliefs rather than consume them.

Image from: http://www.timesofisrael.com/large-locust-swarm-enters-israel-from-egypt/

Middlemen

The most valuable part of having a large social network (for me at least) isn’t visibility, it’s about reducing middlemen. The internet has destroyed many middlemen, and created countless new ones. I barely use the former, and when I don’t have to I avoid the latter. Examples Classifieds –> Craigslist and eBay Travel Agents –>Continue Reading

What DOVE tells us about how we believe today

            Given that I work in media, marketing and advertising I am usually reluctant to critique my own domain, mostly for the reason that it exposes my own self loathing nature. This week however my social feeds have been littered with friends sharing the latest Dove campaign. This version ofContinue Reading

A less lonely elderly

  How will the internet dramatically change our lives as we march towards old age? It’s been just over a year since I lost my grandmother. She was virtually the only elderly person I’ve ever spent a significant amount of time with. One of the lasting memories I have from the final few months ofContinue Reading

Gross Digital Happiness

Happiness metrics have often been thought of as these things that are lofty or ridiculous or simply idealistic. Maybe they are to some extent. Anything not directly tied to money or some economic growth standard doesn’t seem to merit the weight and attention of the general public. Sadly, psychologists contend that most people don’t thinkContinue Reading

A confused economy or an economy of confusion

I was wandering through the bookstore the other evening, parsing through what seems and endless trail of thoughts, ideas, formulations, reformulations and confusing categorizations of knowledge. As culture studies blend with science which blends with business which inevitably ruins everything one that struck me as odd was the nature of the titles that appeared throughout.Continue Reading

Dealing with Duality

Narcissism is often considered to be the driver of a digital network’s success. Omitting certain details (whether unflattering or boring) and highlighting successes has become the unsurprising norm. And this duality of our existence continues to grow the more that the internet pervades our lives. This fissure also begins to develop earlier and earlier asContinue Reading

Building a Future for ‘Work’

I need to say this: We have a LONG way to go in terms of making business “social”, or making businesses social organizations from the inside out. Much of this is predicated on how society approaches the ways in which we work. Case in point: wage issues that affect global workforces, and the ways theseContinue Reading

Entrepreneurship is world-building.

A young entrepreneur asked me the other day what I thought the world looked like, in an economic sense. The question threw me for a loop; typically, people will ask questions like “How much money can I raise for my venture?” (I shrug) or “How long will it take to grow my business?” (I shrug),Continue Reading

This blog post isn’t free.

“There’s no such thing as a free lunch.” It’s a statement that many of us have uttered at some point, and also whole-heartedly believed. But for some reason when it comes to web content, we’ve all been trained into believing the exact opposite. The last decade or so has gone by and professional publishers haven’tContinue Reading