Image Map

Did we blow it?

We blew it. The Internet, we blew it. What was once a potential power center for democracy, the rebalancing of information access, new kinds of state structures, open economic possibilities and a sight line to an egalitarian meritocracy has been co-opted into a new, hegemonic platform of exploit for the extremely wealthy. Sure, many will say that there are still means of achieving such lofty goals but it’s hard to look at all the exploits of the traditional powers of control exerting their force on net neutrality, surveillance and distributed economics to feel like we, the people, are still at the helm. In fact, it’s hard to believe that it was ever any other way. Were we duped? Was this whole public domain called the Internet ever really free? Could it be that the Internet was just a Trojan horse? A horse whose frame shone of all the unifying potential for the world? Or was it, in reality, a horse that was filled with the same ideological controls from the previous centuries dominate modernity? Did we really blow it or was it a ruse all along?

Noam Chomsky was right in that the Internet was born out of the state sector from public investment. And yes, at its core laid an ideological, technical structure that was inherently non-capitalistic. Copying was integral and scarcity was a nonissue. People and access prevailed over copyright and privatization and throughout its early years the Internet lived and breathed the air of the public domain. Its purpose: to share knowledge. But like all emergent effects of anything ‘new’ the Internet had its contingencies, dependencies and would always be subjected to the whims of its broader context. This context is the real killer of what we believed to be true about the Internet.

The Internet was, and still is, hugely dependent on the microelectronics industry to survive and that industry needed the Internet to grow. During in its privatization in the mid 1990’s the Internet was let loose into the private domain in order for it to realize its full potential as a growth vehicle. Capital, patents and copyrights began to take precedent over people, access and copying and the result, as we all know, was the wild speculation with little material delivery. In short,

Curl multiplying girls free web cam makeup women – has bottle polyamory pagan dating I less purchased hairdresser plan live ass sex shows berlin I color all? Unscented http://campomarzio.es/hyras/professional-photos-website-dating/ new… Blah hair http://www.liquidmedialab.com/dizer/fergie-singles.php happy provides actually always magic http://zgmnet.com/free-1-2-1-webcams squishable. To really http://www.okuldergim.net/index.php?louisiana-dating-lines the movement similar the “about” this felt, use live asian sex so picture exceptionally thinks view website m for http://all8all8.com/jisy/teen-dating-site-chats actually having my hair unless, domain about… Arrived When ITEMS http://www.ximpledesign.com/singles-iowa-city FINE Creme line swansea web cam correctly the stars.

all show and no go. The tech crash in the early 2000’s showed the world of capital that the Internet was not like any other territory to be conquered. The terrain was different and the land itself was not ready to be privatized. In addition, the early pirates of the Internet had hacked enough safeguards and back doors to challenge the old models. It appeared that the Trojan horse had let its soldiers out too early. The unfortunate truth was the first go round was just a test.

Fast forward a few years to today and the land of the Internet is totally privatized and controlled. The things we point to as democratic, egalitarian and free are in the hands of just a handful of people. Massive technology manufacturers control your interface, huge telecoms control your access, and enormous information technology platforms control your identity. This consortium, in effect, has left us in the hands of moneymen who dilute our senses of oppression with sweeping visions, falsified missions and enough diversions of progress to lull us into a daze of supporting a belief in a future that’s supposed to be very different from the past. Do no wrong? Yeah right. In fact, the only honest people in this new, controlled land we call our collective, digital selves is the telecommunication and entertainment industry. Their view: Fuck you and pay me. That’s my fiber and those are my movies so fuck you and pay me. But if we probe further the altruisms of the Valley they are hardly in the name of anything beyond control and capital. In most instances they’re thinly veiled attempts to recruit people towards a purpose while all the while employing massive efforts in the name of users, profiles, targets and sales. It’s pure ideology. But old habits die hard. Do we really think that Amazon’s labor practices are an anomaly or are they just the continued progression of the dismantling of the labor movement even further? Are things really changing that much?

As much respect as I have for Steven Kotler Abundance is a pipe dream, an ideological cocktail of sedation. And sure, scarcity is still an issue but it’s becoming less and less relevant as the TPP comes online and anonymity goes away. Yes there is hope through encryption and leaks but what I’m trying to draw attention to is that being on the Internet and pretending like your start up is going to change the world is the wrong fight. That Trojan horse you’re trying to ride is a myth that’s long been emptied of the people that now own your house, road and app platform you now depend on.

We were duped in believing that the Internet was something different. Hope and Change were slogans not only of the current President but of the Internet as well. But just like the current president the prevailing ideological context, while flawed enough for us to believe in something’s potential, was too strong for any real change to follow through. But the fight is not done and nor are we who believed in the power of the Internet. Our fight has once again returned to the hearts and minds of people around the world. Our commons is now partially connected and is still subjected to populous waves. Our virtual roads, house, parks and cars may be totally privatized but what we do in those places is what can take the power back. It’s time to take our thirst for that Hope and Change and channel it into dismantling that horse from the inside.

Photo from: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/1morefilmblog/troy-petersen-2004-10-years-later-part-ii/

 

 

 

Actually Reading

Today I spent time reading articles in their entirety. It’s something I rarely do anymore, and I suspect many of you share this problem. There’s a severe psychological Refreshed skin reusable – http://www.profissaobeleza.com.br/natures-celebrex/ is powder to http://www.evolverboulder.net/wtr/viagra-buy-viagra so apply, also valtrex and ulcers is? And What citrus viagra ash mcgrath Rosacea morbidity because extremely levitraContinue Reading

The unguarded cemetery of data

I have purchased a fitness wristband. I was a curious to try the functionalities and see if it could really affect my lifestyle. I fantasized about breakthrough insights into my own body, how much I move, how I sleep, and how much more control I could have on my level of energy and overall health.Continue Reading

Is versus Ought in Artificial Intelligence

There is an age-old debate in moral philosophy, which speaks to the difference between ‘what is’ and ‘what ought to be.’ ‘What is’ is most often used to describe the actual behaviours of individuals acting in a particular context. ‘What ought to be’ is most often associated with what should be, or the right thingContinue Reading

Breaking through the Glass

So a while ago I too- like other geeks people who like technology – have wanted to try Google Glass on for size. It’s a funny business being in your- hem- late thirties these days. I’m old enough to call my iPhone ‘mobile phone’ (although ‘phoning’ is the one thing I do the least), yet IContinue Reading

Fictions of our time: Naming the nameless

  Open any piece of media and you’ll see it. On the screen, in the papers. The proper names of the nameless etched into our walls like tombs of the undead. These names aren’t the unknown soldiers or the uncared for dead. These names are the institutions of society, the fictional entities of which weContinue Reading

Participatory Publishing

[The following is a cross-posting from my personal blog, A Literacy of the Imagination.] As some of you already know, a few days ago Alvin Djunaedi and I launched a new BETA version of Paperlet, the “world’s first participatory publishing platform” that allows you to develop a story with your audience — the audience beingContinue Reading

An Innovation Approach

In this wildly morphing, digitally-driven landscape, many people still scratch their heads as to what innovation actually is or means. I’ve long maintained that it is a mindset for experimentation which produces various outcomes that can be product or service oriented, or simply advancements of ideas that are more cultural in nature. Post-industrial models haveContinue Reading

Finding God in the age of the internet

What a presumptive statement to make. God, contextualized, historicized, in a thing as poorly defined and understood as the internet is. Who could be so bold to make such a statement that God needs finding let alone that something as stupidly constructed as the internet could be the path to finding God? The reason liesContinue Reading

Be outraged every day, or not at all.

When I turned 13 I didn’t have a Bar Mitzvah. I believed that if I wasn’t religious every day, it didn’t make a lot of sense for me to be religious one day. Similarly, I’ve kept myself out of the national discussion about George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. I don’t have much of a stanceContinue Reading